Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies
Published studies using functional and structural MRI include many errors in the way data are analyzed and conclusions reported. This was observed when working on a comprehensive review of the neural bases of synesthesia, but these errors are probably endemic to neuroimaging studies. All studies reviewed had based their conclusions using Null Hypothesis Significance Tests (NHST). NHST have yet ...
متن کاملCommon Pitfalls in Statistical Thinking
works for quality management and process improvement, statistical thinking is an intrinsic part of building organizational capability. In all of these frameworks there is a degree of flexibility in how the statistical thinking concepts are implemented, because these frameworks apply to many different contexts. Flexibility, however, also leads to ambiguity and inconsistency. The purpose of this ...
متن کاملPitfalls of statistical hypothesis testing: multiple testing.
The word " five " is missing from the third sentence of the fifth paragraph in the online answers to this Endgames article by Philip Sedgwick (BMJ 2014;349:g5310, doi:10.1136/bmj. g5310). The sentence should have read: " For example, the probability of a significant result when there are two, three, four, and five hypothesis tests is 0.
متن کاملCommon pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression
Logistic regression analysis is a statistical technique to evaluate the relationship between various predictor variables (either categorical or continuous) and an outcome which is binary (dichotomous). In this article, we discuss logistic regression analysis and the limitations of this technique.
متن کاملCommon Statistical Pitfalls in Basic Science Research
T he analysis of clinical samples, population samples, and controlled trials is typically subjected to rigorous statistical review. This fact is understandable, given that the results of clinical investigation will often be used to inform patient care or clinical decision making. One would not want to predicate patient advice on research findings that are not correctly interpreted or valid. For...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Neuroscience
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1662-453X
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00018